I have added a page to document my first research project.
These are the potential research questions I am considering for dissertation – - – Yes, I’m being asked to identify them very early in the process! So, please feel free to post comments on these topics. I’d like to know if you think they’re worthwhile questions, whether they’ve already garnered too much research attention, and any thoughts you have on the particular topics…….
Update (10/11/2007): I have now gone through my new student orientation and had two weeks of my Doctoral Competencies (DOCS) class and have had an opportunity to revise a few of my questions. I’ll put my revisions and comments in this blue color to highlight the changes.
Topic Area: Spirituality in the Organization
Do organizations have a soul? I find this question of interest because if organizations do have a soul or spiritual identity, we can find out if companies who have “soul-aligned” their strategies perform better than those that do not. Do companies that soul-align their strategies treat their employees better and engage them more? If the answers to these questions are “yes,” we can then discover ways to help organizations align their spiritual identity with their mission, products, services, ethics, employment practices, etc. My faculty advisor suggested I also explore the impact of the legal structure of corporations based on governmental regulations and how that affects the organization’s soul. For example, in the EU, there are laws that mandate 6 weeks of vacation per year. In the US, each state has different laws regarding Worker’s Compensation…
- Can organizations have self-awareness? If the answer to this question “yes,” then the next questions are:a) Which organizations have self-awareness (explore corporations, non-profits, governments and other organization types)?
- Does anything distinguish self-aware organizations from non-self-aware organizations (profitability, market penetration, best practices, best place to be an employee, large endowments, or the largest socio-political impact),
- Is there a difference between a self-aware organization and self-aware leaders of the organization? What is the “tipping point” for numbers of self-aware leaders within an organization to create a self-aware organization?
With the answer to these questions, we can help C-level executives and other types of organization leaders find ways, through self-awareness, to transform their organizations and achieve their missions
I would like to study corporate senior executives who are experiencing a spiritual void because they have somehow ‘lost themselves’ along the road to success. I want to find out when this occurs during people’s careers, why this happens, and the impact of this state of being on people’s lives (health, family, career, happiness). Then I would look at people who do have a strong spiritual life (I would want to study people of a wide variety of spiritual paths) and ask the same questions, compare and make some conclusions that would add to leadership development theories and disciplines. I used this topic for my first DOCS paper. I reframed the question to the following: Why do executives lose a part of themselves along the road to success and how does this experience impact the lives and careers of their employees? I would like to explore this to find out why this happens and how it impacts the lives and careers of their employees in order to raise leaders to a new level of leadership. (3/7/2008) This topic is related to “executive derailment” – see my blog post on this topic.
Balance between head and heart in musicians – what can business and government leaders learn from musicians?
Topic Area: Leadership
I would like to explore the topic of building leadership teams; taking into account balancing talents, competencies, and styles and answer the question: what really makes a team “gel?” There may be many other factors in making a team gel and I would like to explore current theories, test them and prove/disprove them or add one of my own. The answer to this question can benefit teams of all types. The key would be to look at this question from a multi-dimensional perspective in terms of psychological and organizational theories and frameworks). I don’t believe there is any one model that completely answers this question, though a lot of work has already been done in this field.
Can we learn about organizational dynamics and leadership from ensembles of musicians?
The intimacy between members of a string quartet – moving together in perfect synchronization
Brain function during music making in small ensembles – is there an alignment of brain energy patterns when playing music together? How does this translate to high functioning teams?
Ken Wilbur’s “lower left quadrant” characteristics of his AQAL (All Quadrants, All Levels) Integral Theory (see the Integral Institute website) as applied to leadership competencies would be an interesting study to find out:
- Do these types of leaders exist and what are they doing?
- What impact do these leaders have on the world, the organizations they lead and the people who they lead?
- How do we encourage development of these characteristics in adolescents?
Studying Spiral Dynamics (see one of these two websites http://www.spiraldynamics.org/ or http://www.spiraldynamics.net/ ) – “Tier 2” leaders’ characteristics as applied to leadership competencies to find out if:
- What are these types of leaders are doing?
- What impact do these leaders have on the world, the organizations they lead and the people who they lead?
- How do we encourage development of these characteristics in adolescents?
Topic Area: Communication methods and dynamics
What is the impact of “Web 2.0” technologies on communication? Email, bulletin boards, and forums are passé. My daughter, who is in middle school does her homework while five IM sessions are going on simultaneously, using Bebo (a young-age alternative to MySpace), text messaging on her cell phone, and talking on our land line. Yet, she gets her homework done and gets good grades. I lead a teen group whose members never read the emails I send to them about the activity schedule. I need to send a text message if I want to reach them. How will children growing up now and using these technologies, communication channels and techniques adapt to the work world in five to ten years? A better question is how will organizations adapt to this generation of workers? The answers to these questions will help individuals with their career choices and will help companies with models and methods to attract and retain talent.
How are organizations incorporating these technologies today? Will these technologies change the operating models of current companies? How will established organizations compete with totally new types of organizations and operating models that are born from Web 2.0?
Topic Area: Workforce Dynamics
What will be the values, perspective and culture in the work-force of the future? How will that affect the way organizations of the future function? How will organizations of the future recruit, reward and retain talent? The answer to this question will help us understand how organizations need to adapt to these characteristics and what practices organizations need to eliminate or implement.
Topic Area: Women’s Impact on the world
Do women have the answer to solving the challenges of the third world? Are there specific competencies that are either culturally or intrinsically part of women’s psyche that provide easier progress toward solving the types of challenges faced by the third world? I would like to investigate programs such as The Hunger Project, which focus on empowering people (and especially women) to be self-reliant. With the answers to these questions, we can improve the success and increase the global impact of these programs.

Dorianne,
These are all excellent topics, but I think the first topic and the topic on communication methods and dynamics, are the ones that need the most work out there today. Both have good book potential (with different titles after the PhD, of course), so nothing would be lost in your research.
The latter topic will plaque us going forward in the world of education, as you and I have discussed. We are processing more information in a 24-hour period than our forefathers did in a lifetime, 500 years ago. “Digital tribes” (the IM phenomena) have become the norm for the new generation of workers, and most companies don’t know how to cope with it – other than to ban it in fear.
The topic of mixing religion (or spirituality) with corporate America is still a taboo topic, as they are seen as polar opposites. But slightly altering how it’s presented (later) to something like “Breathing life into an organization,” would allow you to contrast those companies that understand their supporting role in the community, with those companies that don’t feel a need to support the not-for-profit world. In many cases, those former organizations outperform all the others significantly, especially when they “engage” their people in doing good work. People have a “spiritual attachment” to companies that they perceive are helping to change the world. Average people do extraordinary work, because their spirituality has been engaged. That’s the part that most companies don’t get.
Not sure if this helps, but wish you unimaginable success with your HOD program!
Joe DiDonato
By: Joe DiDonato on 4 September 2007
at 10:32 pm
Thank you, Joe for your articulate comments and for being the first to post comments on my blog!
The idea of digital tribes is an interesting one – I wonder if we applied the concepts of Spiral Dynamics; would we see progressively more complex means of interaction up the spiral as these “tribes” (purple?) evolve?
With regard to the amount of information we each have to process, I wonder if the people who can filter out the “noise” will be more successful, less stressed, etc. or whether people need to be able to process information in a more parallel manner. In computer lingo, it would be moving from time-sharing on one CPU to massive parallel processing……
Why is spirituality still taboo in the corporate world? I’m reading about and seeing leaders be more open about this topic. Obviously the message needs to be tempered to allow the audience to really hear it. However, at some point, spirituality (and I don’t mean religion – there’s a difference) has to ‘come out’ of the closet.
By: Dorianne on 5 September 2007
at 3:36 pm
All of these topics are definitely fun to think about exploring–how fun for you!! …as you look at what leaders are doing, my research is about what they are thinking…the two things together are powerful.
Here is an interesting part of that–what do they think and then what do they do? W. Isaacs talks about the science of action–the connection between the two things. Do they match? Why or why not? What are the pre-conditions to get them to match? So, why would someone think one thing and do another?
Does awareness turn into practice…and does practice create intended outcomes?
I have many more questions, than answers…I know you do too…let’s create new knowledge in this world. I am excited for you Dorianne!!! mel
By: Mel Minarik on 12 September 2007
at 11:18 am
Mel, thank you for your post and what great questions! I am actually very interested in the relationship between what leaders think and feel and what they do. I guess I didn’t articulate that very well in my initial statement about research interests.
I think a lot of work has already been done about what leaders do, so I’m wanting to study the interior life of leaders and how that impacts their leadership capatilities and organizations.
I’m such a newbie with the whole arena of Human Development and Organizational Development, so keep the questions coming. I really look forward to more dialogue!
By: Dorianne on 13 September 2007
at 4:43 pm
Dorianne – Your topics are all excellent. The one that ressonates with me is the first one – Sprituality in Organizations. From personal experience, I have been fortunate to work in both corporate and non-profit areans. My recent position is with the Jane Goodall Institute, a non profit focusing on making a difference in the world through education, compassion and action with youth. Wow, talk about sprituality at its highest. The folks in this organization are like-minded and focused on the highest and the best. I have traveled for the past 3 weeks on a tour with Dr. Jane Goodall. She is inspiring and humbleling to be around – short of a better description she reminds me of Mother Teresa. My point here is I believe that organizations that have a soul do preform better, their employees preform better and movement and change is swift. What a difference this has made in my life and I would be happy to share more with you. I wish you much success along your journey. How exciting for you and for us (your readers). Karen
By: karenoxrider on 10 October 2007
at 7:53 am
Thank you Karen for your inspiriation. I have gotten a lot of feedback from my fellow students that this is a good topic and I should keep on searching for literature out there about it (I was having a hard time finding much when I searched using “spirituality” and “leaders” or “business.” I’m so happy for you that you’ve found a great spiritually oriented organization to work for!
By: Dorianne on 11 October 2007
at 8:00 am
Dorianne,
I’ll be starting the Fielding program in March.
I’ve got a friend at the university where I work who’s also interested in spirituality in the corporation. He’s just about finished his PhD in Business.
Maybe he could give you some ideas about where to search for material on this topic.
Email me for details. As well, I’d love to hear about your Fielding experience so far and the mentoring relationship you have with Valerie. I’ve asked her to be my mentor as well.
Dan
By: Dan on 13 December 2007
at 6:38 pm
Dorianne,
I LOVE your questions.
As you know my passion is helping leaders create organizations that operate at the higher level of Spirit. In my book I talk about the six levels of engagement. The level of Spirit is a level of soul connectedness and social engagement that can only come from the authentic expression of self (read purpose, passion, core values and unique ability = character). When an entire organization has access to the gift of knowing the true expression of their individual soul, then and only then can they choose to align with an organization.
Right now my experience is that organizations are run almost entirely on fear of failure versus the possibility of it all. I believe that when one is operating at the level of spirit, at the level of authentic self, then the focus is on contribution to others. Organizations that operate at that level are going to be extraordinary. And I believe there are some organizations out there, like Karen’s above, that will allow you to demonstrate this is true.
As for me, I already believe and hopefully, over the course of your research, I will be able to provide a subject or two for you to study. My new book, “The Last Start-Up – A Leader’s Journey to Mastery” is about creating just such an organization.
By the way, the kids of today, with the seemingly short attention spans, perhaps they are simply the beings that we need to live into the possibility we are seeking: the truth of who we really are.
It is so great to have someone I love and respect working to prove what I have faith already exists and can be modeled and created.
I’ll build it. You explain and prove it. What a team!
Yours on the journey,
Tom
By: Tom Voccola on 31 December 2007
at 5:45 pm
Hello,
Thanks for your email.
I like the idea of a soul of an organisation. Sorry, have you decided which topic you go for yet?
If you work on the spiritual topic I would be most interested if you could contribute to some discussions on my blog?
http://cb-consulting.blogspot.com/search/label/spirituality%20and%20business
Am looking forward hearing from you.
Volker
By: Volker on 12 January 2008
at 2:07 am
I’m still having fun exploring these various topics. I would be happy to contribute to your blog discussions – - right now I’m pressed for time, but will do so in the future.
I think I may add some pages regarding consciousness (or soul) and related theories for individual humans and for organizations. I’m learning a lot right now and am just putting these ideas together. I will include a bibliography too.
By: Dorianne on 13 January 2008
at 2:17 pm
[...] My Research [...]
By: “Workforce” - a term of the past « PhD Confidential on 7 September 2008
at 7:43 am
I really enjoyed your website and your insights concerning spirituality in the worplace. Interestingly, I am considering a PhD from Fieldings. So, a few questions if you don’t mind. Why did you choose Fieldings? Is it proving to be a good choice over larger, well known universities? Why or why not?
Thank you again for your insights,
Anne
By: Anne on 15 April 2009
at 9:19 am
I wrote a post on this blog entitled “Why Fielding” that should answer some of your questions. http://phdconfidential.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/why-fielding/
It has proven to be a great choice for me. While Fielding is not large and not considered main-stream, many of the faculty have come from well-known, large universities because of Fielding’s unique program. The faculty and students have an opportunity to explore topics and research questions that are on the leading edge. We are less constrained by traditions and dogma that tend to prevent original thinking.
The best thing for you to assess is the types of topics you are interested in exploring and the type of program (structured vs self-directed) you will find most supportive of your personal learning style. Best of luck on your journey!
By: Dorianne on 18 May 2009
at 11:57 am
1) Your research interests -topics are extremelly interesting! Although, I have a difficulty to imagine how one can draw specific hypotheses, develop a scientific/experimental research design to support/reject the assumptions you make. I suggest that you “narrow” your scientific questions so that the variables you are studying can be measured somehow; for instance, how can we measure spirituality, or “soul” etc. You see, although, these are excellent topics if you are writing a book, they can make your life very difficult in case of a PhD research.
2) You can possibly find answers to your questions from a psychoanalytically informed point-of-view. Leaders of organizations, serve as role models, whereas followers through a “projective indentification” process self-identify with the leader, thus loosing their self-awareness
(see Freud’s writings on the psychology of crowds etc).
3) From a social psychology perspective (Zimbardo experiment, Milgram etc) you can study the mechanisms through which the “corporation” imposes its will (culture) on group members (followers) thus developing a “corporate soul”.
I hope, I have helped somehow…
Wish you the best
George Profetis, PhD
By: George Profetis on 17 August 2009
at 11:47 pm
Thanks George, for you comments and suggestions. I really appreciate the feedback. In response:
1) I completely agree with you about narrowing down my topics into questions that can really be researched. My faculty advisor is telling me to focus now too. Those questions were all drafted when I started the program. I will post the specific questions as I get closer to my proposal stage.
2 & 3) I recently took a Social Psychology class that helped me to understand some of these concepts. I will do some reading on “projective identification” to broaden my understanding. I’m writing a paper on Edgar Schein’s work as related corporate culture and leadership. Thanks!
By: Dorianne on 23 October 2009
at 1:55 pm